User talk:Henryk Borawski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Witam. Henryk Borawski (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Henryk Borawski!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you wrote 2nd of July - where do you know that from? I doubt that :D ...Sicherlich Post 13:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, ale dlaczego tylko rok ja znam miesiac? nie rozumiem ..Sicherlich Post 18:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za spostrzegawczość. To moja omyłka pisarska w postaci powtórzenia "in". Lowdown (talk) 07:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Government buildings in Łódź[edit]

Witaj – co to znaczy "Budynki rządowe w Łodzi" [1], "rządowe" czyli jakie? – Darekm135 (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rozumiem, ale tutaj umieściłeś "Government buildings in Łódź‎" w kat. opisanej: Samorząd Łodzi (Government of Łódź) / a w kat. "Government buildings in Łódź" jest "Town hall in Łódź" (poza Urz. Miasta jest tam też Urz. Woj., ale tylko gościnnie – całość jest własnością miasta), natomiast ze starym ratuszem na placu Wolności mogę się zgodzić [2] – historycznie własność miasta, ale obecnie siedziba Archiwum Państwowego, czyli spełnia Twoją definicję budynku rządowego, tylko to chyba nie powinno być w kat. "Government of Łódź" [3] – Pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Przepraszam, ale tak też nie powinno być: np. "Police in Łódź‎" lub "Firefighting in Łódź‎" są w kat. "Public services in Łódź" – i to rozumiem – ale "Public services in Łódź" jest w kat. "Services in Łódź", a ta ostatnia kategoria w "Commerce in Łódź" i następnie w "Economy of Łódź". "Banking in Łódź‎", "Housing in Łódź‎" tak, ale co ma Police lub Firefighting wspólnego z Commerce? – Darekm135 (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Co to jest "Fhotos"? Zwiadowca 21 17:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Widzę, że jesteś na commonsie a mimo wszystko nie odpowiadasz. Chyba należało by to zmienić. Zwiadowca 21 15:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Grocery_stores_in_Sanok_⋅ has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rudolph Buch (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nie rozumiem tej edycji. Chyba zamiast Category:Vehicles in Szczecin by color powinna być kategora Category:Buses in Szczecin by color. Zmieniłem. Zwiadowca 21 20:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To znowu ja. :) Skoro utworzyłeś tę kategorię, to powinieneś też stworzyć kategorie:

Zwiadowca 21 20:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nie ma takiej kategorii. Zwiadowca 21 23:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

tematu nie było. Zwiadowca 21 23:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots[edit]


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Twój wniosek o zmianę nazwy nie mógł być uwzględniony, ponieważ nie był zgodny z zasadami Commons. Punkt 5 regulaminu zmiany nazw, na który się powołałeś, mówi o łamaniu zasad, takich jak przekleństwa, reklamy, itp. Jeśli jest to plik, który wgraliśmy na Commons sami, można korzystać z punktu #1 -- uploader's request. Przy kryterium nr 1 można zmienić nazwę nawet wtedy, gdy ta zmiana nie spełnia innych wymogów.

Pozdrawiam, Wieralee (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK. Jakie pliki powinny mieć zmienioną nazwę?
    • pkt (#) 5 powód zmiany nazwy - "Poprawa błędów w nazwach plików (np. prawidłowa pisownia czy data w nazwie pliku)",
    • pkt (#) 7 powód, gdy to ma na celu "Usunięcie pejoratywnych, obraźliwych lub wulgarnych słów z nazw plików".

Więc, w czym tkwił mój błąd ? HaB >talk< 03:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karol Świderski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oleola (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Białystok[edit]

Dzień dobry – czy potrafisz określić co przedstawia to zdjęcie, czy może to być Białystok? [4] Sugerowałem się barwami na flagach i obecnością wśród tych zdjęć (podpisane Trip to Poland) m.in. zdjęcia dworca w Białymstoku – pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Buildings_in_Kraków_by_type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gentelmen`s Night Club Exclusive in Białystok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.51.26.113 09:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monrol Mońki (hala produkcyjna).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Biuro Monrol (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monrol in Mońki.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Biuro Monrol (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monrol w Mońkach (surowce) 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Biuro Monrol (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monrol in Mońki 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Biuro Monrol (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monrol w Mońkach (surowce) 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Biuro Monrol (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sports coaches from Turkey[edit]

Hi. I just began to categorize and fill with subcats the Category:Sports coaches from Turkey initiated and -sort of to say- "developed" by you. The cat only covers/covered Turkey's "national association football team trainers" and includes foreign coaches under the title "from Turkey"! I rarely -if ever- use the exclamation mark. Please do not categorize on areas you do not know well. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 04:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:A device for pumping in Białystok at Sienkiewicza Street.jpg[edit]

Hello Henrky

a) Is 'File:A device for pumping in Białystok at Sienkiewicza Street.jpg' a photo of this bicycle repair station: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4169222264 ? If so, I will add a link to the OSM object.

b) I suggest adding the image to the category 'Bicycle repair stations in Białystok' or 'Bicycle repair stations in Podlaskie'. I think Białystok is a big enough city to deserve it's own category. Any thoughts?

Thanks, Jake Wkmdjay (talk) 07:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sportspeople of Istanbul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 13:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020![edit]

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Boxers Hutnik Kraków has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


109.76.85.144 17:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bajkoland Białystok 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted character artwork (Mickey Mouse)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

(Oinkers42) (talk) 05:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bajkoland Białystok 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]